Matrices below every circulant
Minc’s list · Problem 11
Matrices below every circulant
Open
- Posed by
- Minc
- First posed
- 1983
Statement
Posed by H. Minc in 1983, among the new problems of his survey of the theory of permanents for 1978–1981.
Problem 11. Let \(\Lambda_n^k\) be the set of \(n\times n\) \((0,1)\)-matrices with every row and column sum equal to \(k\). Does there exist a matrix in \(\Lambda_n^k\) whose permanent is strictly smaller than that of any circulant in \(\Lambda_n^k\)?
In other words: for which pairs \((n,k)\) is the minimum permanent over \(\Lambda_n^k\) not attained by a circulant? Call a matrix that does better than every circulant a beater.
Prior progress
- The minimum permanent over \(\Lambda_n^k\) is known for all \(n\le11\) by exhaustive enumeration (Wanless). A beater exists exactly for the \(15\) pairs \((5,3)\), \((9,3)\), \((10,3)\), \((11,3)\), \((8,4)\), \((9,4)\), \((10,4)\), \((11,4)\), \((7,5)\), \((9,6)\), \((10,6)\), \((9,7)\), \((10,7)\), \((11,8)\) and \((11,9)\).
- There is never a beater for \(k\in\{1,2,n-1,n\}\). For \(k=n-2\) the minimizers were characterized by Henderson (1975) and McKay and Wanless (1998), from which it follows that a beater exists exactly when \(n\ge5\) is odd.
- Schrijver (1998) and Wanless (2006) showed that the minimum permanent grows like \(\beta_k^{\,n}\) with \(\beta_k=(k-1)^{k-1}/k^{k-2}\).
Our progress so far
- Sparse matrices. For every fixed \(k\ge3\) a beater exists for all large \(n\), and more generally whenever \(k^3\log n=o(n)\). For fixed \(k\) the existence also follows by combining Csikvári’s 2016 theorem on vertex-transitive graphs with Wanless’s result above.
- Dense matrices, explicitly. A beater exists for \(k=n-3\) whenever \(n\ge93{,}570\), and for \(k=n-4\) whenever \(n\ge163{,}521\).
- The line \(k=n-3\) up to \(n=18\). There is no beater for \(n\le8\) and there is one for \(9\le n\le18\); the cases \(12\le n\le18\) are new. We also found the exact minima \(17{,}846{,}856\) over \(\Lambda_{12}^9\) and \(238{,}012{,}092\) over \(\Lambda_{13}^{10}\), both below every circulant, and beaters for \(k=n-4\) at \(n=16,17,18\).
- Cubic matrices beyond order \(11\). For \((12,3)\) there is no beater, because the minimum \(113\) is attained by a circulant. For \((13,3)\) there is: the minimum is \(153\), while every circulant has permanent at least \(159\). For \((14,3)\) we found a matrix with permanent \(213\), below every circulant (\(229\)).
References
- H. Minc, Theory of permanents 1978–1981, Linear and Multilinear Algebra 12 (1983), 227–263. doi:10.1080/03081088308817488
- J. R. Henderson, Permanents of (0,1)-matrices having at most two zeros per line, Canad. Math. Bull. 18 (1975), 353–358. doi:10.4153/CMB-1975-064-6
- B. D. McKay and I. M. Wanless, Maximising the permanent of (0,1)-matrices and the number of extensions of Latin rectangles, Electron. J. Combin. 5 (1998), R11. doi:10.37236/1349
- A. Schrijver, Counting 1-factors in regular bipartite graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 72 (1998), 122–135. doi:10.1006/jctb.1997.1798
- I. M. Wanless, Addendum to Schrijver’s work on minimum permanents, Combinatorica 26 (2006), 743–745. doi:10.1007/s00493-006-0040-z
- I. M. Wanless, On Minc’s sixth conjecture, Linear and Multilinear Algebra 55 (2007), 57–63. doi:10.1080/03081080600562670
- P. Csikvári, Matchings in vertex-transitive bipartite graphs, Israel J. Math. 215 (2016), 99–134. doi:10.1007/s11856-016-1375-9